Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
Published on: August 11, 2017
Comparative analysis of four hospital cleaning validation methods
William A Rutala1, Hajime Kanamori2, Maria F Gergen3
1Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Fluorescent markers best indicated hospital surface cleanliness, outperforming adenosine triphosphate (ATP) methods by better reflecting microbiological data. This study assessed four cleaning assessment tools in hospital settings.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare-associated infection control
- Environmental hygiene monitoring
- Microbiology and public health
Background:
- Assessing hospital surface cleanliness is crucial for infection prevention.
- Four distinct methods were evaluated for their efficacy in determining surface hygiene.
- Hospital environmental surfaces were sampled before and after cleaning protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of four different methods for assessing hospital surface cleanliness.
- To identify the most reliable method for evaluating the thoroughness of cleaning and disinfection procedures.
- To determine which method best correlates with microbiological standards for surface hygiene.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study was conducted across 10 intensive care units and 14 non-intensive care units.
- Environmental surface samples were collected before and after daily cleaning and disinfection procedures.
- Four methods were used to assess cleanliness: fluorescent markers, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing at two thresholds, and standard aerobic plate counts.
Main Results:
- No statistical correlation was found between adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels and standard aerobic plate counts.
- Fluorescent markers classified 72% of surfaces as clean compared to standard aerobic cultures.
- ATP methods classified significantly fewer surfaces as clean (13.5% and 27%) compared to standard cultures.
Conclusions:
- Fluorescent markers proved to be the most effective tool for assessing hospital surface cleanliness.
- The fluorescent marker method demonstrated the thoroughness of wiping, aligning better with microbiological data than ATP.
- This study highlights the superior utility of fluorescent markers over ATP for evaluating environmental hygiene in healthcare settings.
Related Concept Videos
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Handwashing I: Introduction and Types of Equipment
Hand wash basins in clinical areas should have faucets that can be turned on and off without using the hands; that is, they should be non-touch or lever-operated.
