Related Experiment Videos
Quality improvement in emergency units in low resource settings: a qualitative assessment for understanding
Indrakantha Welgama1, Daniel Lange1, Gerard O'Reilly2
1Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Objective:
This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators for quality improvement (QI) in emergency units (EUs) in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) and to understand the prioritisation of care quality domains to inform the development of EU-specific guidance for QI across all World Health Organisation (WHO quality domains for LMICs.
Methods:
We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with specialist emergency physicians from LMICs and convened a workshop with global technical experts in emergency care. A structured topic guide was used for the IDIs. Interviews were conducted virtually, transcribed and thematically analysed using the WHO quality domains and the WHO Health Systems Framework. Data collection and analysis continued until saturation was reached. The 2-day workshop included presentations, discussions and interactive ranking exercises to assess measurements for QI and prioritise WHO quality domains for guidance development. Findings from both components were synthesised to generate key insights.
Findings:
Eleven IDIs were conducted and 26 experts participated at the workshop. QI efforts in LMIC EUs primarily focused on quality domains of effectiveness, timeliness, safety and occasionally patient-centredness. Key barriers to QI included high patient turnover, a lack of skilled staff, limited funds and resources and prioritising patient care quantity over quality. Facilitators included the availability of QI guidance, training, initiating small-scale projects, enhancing documentation and communication and supportive hospital management. Safety and effectiveness were considered the most feasible domains for QI, although all domains were considered important. Variability in how participants defined these domains highlighted the need for clear guidance on definitions, their relative importance and appropriate measures for each.
Conclusions:
EUs are complex, high-pressure environments managing time-critical health conditions and require development of specific tools and guidance for QI. Addressing the barriers and leveraging facilitators identified in this study can inform the development of effective QI strategies for LMIC EUs.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...