Related Experiment Videos
Determinants of adherence to calcium/vitamin D supplements in a cross-sectional study
Daniel Gómez-Costas1, Ana de Lorenzo-Pinto1, Covadonga Iznaola-Muñoz2
1Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, España.
Objective:
Adherence to combined calcium and vitamin D supplements is often suboptimal, yet the independent role of formulation attributes (pharmaceutical form, organoleptic profile, acceptability) remains understudied. The aim was to estimate Calcium/Vitamin D adherence in real-world practice and to identify associated factors, with particular emphasis on formulation characteristics and patient-perceived acceptability.
Methods:
Population-based analytical cross-sectional study (STROBE guidelines). Random telephone interviews were conducted with 360 participants from a tertiary hospital catchment area in Madrid, with active prescriptions for over 6 months, complementing the data with electronic dispensing records. Global adherence was defined as the simultaneous fulfillment of: self-reported adherence >90%, a Morisky-Green result compatible with adherence, and ≥90% of expected dispensations in the previous 6 months. Formulations were classified a priori into five organoleptic groups based on their sweetener and flavor profile. Acceptability was assessed using 1-5 Likert scales for taste, texture, and overall rating. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with adherence.
Results:
Twenty-two different formulations were identified. Global adherence was 34.7% (95% CI: 30.0-39.8). Agreement between measures was moderate (κ = 0.38-0.60). Self-reporting (70.8%) significantly overestimated adherence compared to dispensing records (40.3%). Chewable tablets showed higher adherence than orodispersible and effervescent forms. In the multivariable model, adherence was independently associated with female sex (aOR 2.69; 95% CI: 1.59-4.59), polypharmacy (>10 drugs) (aOR 2.32; 95% CI: 1.32-4.07), polyol-based organoleptic group (aOR 2.43; 95% CI: 1.26-4.77) and overall rating of 5/5 (aOR 6.17; 95% CI: 3.16-12.50). Adverse reactions (reported by 15.3% of participants) reduced the probability of adherence (aOR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08-0.58). Forgetfulness was the main reason for non-adherence (63.8%), followed by organoleptic problems and intolerance. The model showed good discrimination (Area under the curve 0.83).
Conclusions:
Strict adherence to calcium/vitamin D is low, and self-reporting substantially overestimates actual compliance. Beyond classical patient-level factors, formulation tolerability and acceptability emerge as independent, potentially modifiable determinants of adherence. A simple screening strategy based on patient overall rating, adverse reactions and formulation organoleptic profile could guide early, pragmatic interventions such as adherence support and timely formulation switching.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Role of Vitamins in Maintaining Bone Health
Vitamin A
Vitamin A is involved in the process of bone remodeling. Retinoic acid, the active metabolite of Vitamin A, has nuclear receptors in osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which are involved in bone remodeling.
Vitamin B12
Vitamin B12 acts as a cofactor during the formation of osteoblast-related proteins, such as osteocalcin. Vitamin B12 plays a role...
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Anatomical Parameters
Essential Minerals for Bone Health
Calcium and Phosphorus
Calcium is a critical component of bones, especially in the form of calcium phosphate and calcium carbonate. Since the body cannot make calcium, it must be obtained from the diet. However, calcium cannot be absorbed from the small intestine without...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies