Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Magnetic Fluorescent Bead-Based Dual-Reporter Flow Analysis of PDL1-Vaxx Peptide Vaccine-Induced Antibody Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction
Published on: July 7, 2023
Subcutaneous Amivantamab and Lazertinib in PALOMA-3: Efficacy, Safety, and Administration: A Vodcast
1Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Huntington Beach, CA, USA. dannynguyen@coh.org.
Abstract:
Intravenous (IV) amivantamab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-MET bispecific antibody, is approved for multiple indications alone or in combination for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the PALOMA-3 study, subcutaneous (SC) amivantamab was investigated to improve tolerability, reduce administration time, maintain efficacy, and improve patient experience. This vodcast reviews the rationale and data supporting SC amivantamab on the basis of the PALOMA-3 study and provides expert-led recommendations for SC amivantamab treatment. The PALOMA-3 study investigated the noninferiority of pharmacokinetics, with other endpoints including efficacy and safety of SC versus IV amivantamab, combined with lazertinib in participants with EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. Geometric mean ratios of Ctrough for SC to IV amivantamab were 1.15 at Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) and 1.42 at C4D1; C2AUCD1-D15 was 1.035. Objective response rate (ORR) was 30% in the SC group and 33% in the IV group; median progression-free survival was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. SC amivantamab resulted in fewer patients reporting infusion-related reactions (IRR; 13% versus 66% IV) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; 9% versus 14%) with prophylactic anticoagulation; shorter administration time at C1D1 (< 5 min per SC injection versus ~ 5 h for IV); and higher patient-reported convenience at the end of treatment (85% versus 35%). We discuss clinical considerations for SC amivantamab dosing and administration, including premedications, prophylactic measures, dose modifications, management of adverse reactions, and switching between IV and SC amivantamab. In conclusion, SC amivantamab demonstrated noninferior pharmacokinetics and antitumor responses compared with IV amivantamab in the PALOMA-3 study. SC amivantamab also reduced IRR and VTE, with shorter treatment administration times and enhanced patient convenience compared with IV. Utilizing SC amivantamab, while optimizing treatment efficacy and safety through mitigating and managing adverse events, may enhance the patient experience.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...