Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

12:28
Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
Published on: June 3, 2020
Pooling quantitative MRI data: A multi-protocol study of healthy subcortical aging
Mikhail Zubkov1, Kerrin J Pine2, Pierre-Louis Bazin3
1GIGA-Institute, CRC-Human Imaging Unit, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.
Imaging Neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
|August 6, 2026
Summary
Pooling quantitative MRI data from different ultra-high-field scanners can impact aging studies. While combining data increases statistical power, protocol differences introduce biases, affecting results for R1, R2*, and volume measures.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Biophysics
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Quantitative MRI (qMRI) offers biophysical tissue properties, ideally independent of scanner and protocol.
- Current qMRI methods exhibit variability across sites and acquisition schemes, hindering data pooling.
- Pooling data enhances statistical power for longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, especially in aging research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of protocol and hardware differences on pooling large ultra-high-field (UHF) qMRI data in healthy aging.
- To evaluate how pooling affects age-dependent qMRI parameters and identify protocol-related biases, particularly in subcortical structures.
- To assess the combined effects of data pooling and protocol variations on age-related changes in qMRI metrics.
Main Methods:
- Combined an open-access aging UHF qMRI MP2RAGE dataset with two multiparameter mapping (MPM) datasets.
- Evaluated age dependence of qMRI parameters (R1, R2*, volume) in pooled and individual datasets.
- Analyzed protocol-specific biases and their influence on inferred age-related changes, focusing on subcortical structures.
Main Results:
- Pooled data revealed age-related R1 changes of 4-17% and R2* variations of 6-30% across structures.
- Subcortical structure volume changes ranged from 5-26% over the lifespan in the pooled dataset.
- R1 and volume showed larger protocol-dependent differences, while R2* remained more consistent across regions.
Conclusions:
- Pooling UHF qMRI data from diverse sources can be both beneficial (statistical power) and detrimental (protocol bias) for aging analyses.
- Protocol standardization is crucial for reliable data pooling in multi-site qMRI studies.
- Understanding and quantifying protocol effects is essential for accurate interpretation of age-related changes in qMRI parameters.

