Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Lung Cancer
Mengyuan Qiao1, Li Luo2, Hui Zhang2
1School of Nursing, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Background:
Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a major clinical challenge faced by lung cancer patients during or after treatment. Early identification of at-risk populations by healthcare professionals is inadequate, and little is known about measures that can be taken to enhance their prevention. Existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized common risk factors for CRCI in lung cancer patients, but integrated predictive models based on holistic theoretical frameworks remain scarce.
Aim:
To construct a visual assessment tool for the identification of CRCI in lung cancer survivors based on the theory of unpleasant symptoms (TOUS), complementing existing predictive models with a multidimensional theoretical perspective.
Design:
A prospective, observational, single-centre study.
Methods:
The present study was conducted in a major hospital in Urumqi, China, between October 2023 and July 2024. A total of 350 lung cancer survivors participated in this survey, which was divided into a training and validation group in a 7:3 ratio. Lasso regression and logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the risk factors for CRCI, construct a nomogram prediction model and test the prediction effect in the validation set. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and goodness-of-fit statistics, and the model was internally validated.
Results:
A total of 350 lung cancer patients, comprising 245 in the training and 105 in validation groups, were included. Of these, 117 (33.4%) experienced CRCI. The predictive model identified significant predictors, including age, pathological stage, chemotherapy, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and social support scores. At the 32.3% optimal cut-off, the model had AUC values of 0.863 and 0.818 in the training and validation groups. Calibration plots demonstrated a strong correlation between predicted and observed rates, and decision curve analysis revealed optimal net benefit at threshold probabilities ranging from 10% to 80%.
Conclusions:
The risk prediction model constructed in this study, based on TOUS, demonstrates satisfactory predictive ability superior to some existing models. It integrates physiological, psychological and environmental factors, serving as a valuable complementary tool for healthcare professionals in identifying high-risk groups, particularly in clinical settings emphasizing holistic symptom management.