Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

10:26
Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Intellectual Humility and Probabilistic Belief
Logan Nelson1, Kathryn McGregor1, Tania Lombrozo1
1Department of Psychology, Princeton University.
Cognitive Science
|August 6, 2026
Summary
Believing things probabilistically, rather than as certainties, is linked to greater intellectual humility (IH). This association was found for specific beliefs, suggesting probabilistic thinking may foster IH.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Beliefs can be expressed as binary certainties or probabilistic estimations.
- Probabilistic beliefs inherently acknowledge uncertainty and fallibility, core components of intellectual humility (IH).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between probabilistic belief expression and intellectual humility.
- To determine if probabilistic belief is linked to greater IH across different samples and belief types.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted with student and nationally representative samples.
- Participants' trait-level and belief-specific IH were assessed.
- Beliefs were categorized as binary or probabilistic, controlling for belief extremity.
Main Results:
- No significant association was found between trait-level IH and probabilistic belief across participants.
- A significant positive association was found between belief-specific IH and probabilistic belief within participants.
- This association held for political and moral beliefs, even when controlling for belief extremity.
Conclusions:
- A distinction exists between binary and probabilistic belief systems.
- Probabilistic belief expression is associated with greater intellectual humility towards specific beliefs.
- Promoting probabilistic thinking may enhance intellectual humility in various domains, including politics and morality.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Magical Thinking
Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...