Rapid Mixed-Methods Assessment and Institutional Co-Design of Breastfeeding Support to Enhance Maternal Confidence in
Dilpreet Kaur1, Rakesh Kumar2, Inderdeep Singh Kochar3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. S.S. Tantia Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Sriganganagar, RJ, India.
Background:
Despite strong policy support, many Indian mothers discontinue breastfeeding early. Maternal confidence, rather than knowledge alone, predicts breastfeeding success, yet institution-based approaches to building confidence remain limited. We employed rapid mixed-methods research to identify barriers and co-design feasible support interventions within a teaching hospital.
Research Aims:
To identify barriers influencing breastfeeding confidence, quantify barrier prevalence and associations with maternal confidence, and co-design and pilot-test an institutionally feasible intervention through participatory stakeholder engagement.
Methods:
This was a sequential mixed-methods study (November 2024-April 2025) at a teaching hospital in north-western India. Phase 1: Qualitative assessment (n = 47) through interviews and focus groups. Phase 2: Cross-sectional survey (n = 232) measuring breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSES-SF), barriers, social support, and depressive symptoms. Phase 3: Participatory co-design and micro-pilot (n = 26) of intervention integrated into hospital workflows.
Results:
Qualitative analysis identified four barrier domains: early experiences (70%), social/family influences (62%), healthcare interactions (55%), and emotional well-being (48%). Survey findings: 63% reported milk supply concerns, 58% pain, 49% conflicting family advice. Mean BSES-SF = 46.2 (SD 9.8); 32% scored low confidence. Early difficulties (β = -5.8, p < 0.001), low social support (β = -4.1, p < 0.001), depression (β = -3.6, p < 0.001), and primiparity (β = -2.3, p = 0.005) were independently associated with lower confidence (R2 = 0.41). Stakeholders prioritized three components: peer support (94% endorsement), provider communication tools (89%), and family counseling (83%). The micro-pilot demonstrated high acceptability (88%) and feasibility (median delivery time 7 min) with no additional staffing.
Conclusion:
Teaching hospitals can rapidly identify breastfeeding confidence barriers and co-design contextually appropriate, low-cost interventions. This model offers a scalable pathway for strengthening breastfeeding support in resource-constrained settings.
Related Concept Videos
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Development of Human Microbiota

