Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Intersecting Generational, Gender, and Racial Disparities in Intimate Partner Physical and Sexual Violence: A
1Department of Social Work, School of Health Natural Sciences and Human Services, Westfield State University, 577 Western Avenue, Westfield, MA, 01806, USA. sfakunmoju@westfield.ma.edu.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) risk varies by gender, race, and generation. Millennials and women reported higher rates, with specific vulnerabilities at the intersection of these identities.
Area of Science:
- Sociology
- Criminology
- Public Health
Background:
- Demographic disparities in intimate partner violence (IPV) are recognized, but the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and generation is underexplored.
- Existing research often treats demographic factors in isolation, limiting a comprehensive understanding of IPV risk and perpetration.
- An intersectional approach is crucial for identifying nuanced patterns in IPV experiences across diverse populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the joint influence of gender, race/ethnicity, and generation on physical and sexual IPV victimization and perpetration.
- To address the gap in research regarding the intersectional effects of demographic variables on IPV.
- To identify specific subgroups with heightened vulnerability to IPV victimization and perpetration.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an intersectional framework to analyze data from 467 US adults in intimate relationships.
- Conducted a three-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) across four generational cohorts: Generation Z, Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers.
- Examined both physical and sexual IPV victimization and perpetration, considering main and interaction effects of gender, race/ethnicity, and generation.
Main Results:
- Victimization was more prevalent than perpetration; slapping/throwing objects were most common abusive behaviors.
- Significant main effects: Women reported higher sexual victimization; Millennials reported higher overall victimization and perpetration.
- Interaction effects revealed unique vulnerabilities: e.g., White women higher victimization than White men; Millennial Black/non-White participants higher perpetration than White counterparts.
Conclusions:
- Findings underscore the necessity of considering intersecting identities to understand IPV dynamics.
- Culturally and generationally responsive prevention strategies, grounded in intersectionality and social learning theory, are essential.
- Future interventions should be tailored to address the specific risks identified within intersecting demographic subgroups.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Bullying
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Sex Linked Disorders