Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Evaluating Bright Futures Pediatric Handouts: Readability, Understandability, Actionability, and Clinical
Yusuke Matsuura1,2, Emily Myers1,2
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Insights
Bright Futures handouts are readable and understandable for pediatric patients and parents. However, improving the actionability of these materials can enhance their effectiveness in promoting child health.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Health Communication
- Patient Education
Background:
- Bright Futures Parent and Patient Handouts are frequently used in pediatric well-child visits.
- Systematic evaluation of these widely-used materials has been limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the readability, understandability, and actionability of the fourth-edition Bright Futures handouts.
- To identify areas for improvement in patient education materials.
Main Methods:
- Readability was assessed using standard formulas.
- Understandability and actionability were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P).
Main Results:
- Patient Handouts averaged a 4th to 7th-grade reading level.
- Parent Handouts ranged from approximately 5th to nearly 7th-grade reading levels.
- PEMAT-P scores indicated high understandability (92.3%) but lower actionability (60%).
Conclusions:
- Bright Futures Handouts are generally readable and understandable, supporting their use in pediatric settings.
- Opportunities exist to enhance the actionability of these materials.
- Strategies like plain language, visual aids, and checklists can improve patient education materials and health outcomes.
Abstract:
Bright Futures Parent and Patient Handouts from the American Academy of Pediatrics are widely used after pediatric well-child visits, yet their content has not been systematically evaluated. We assessed all fourth-edition handouts using standard readability formulas for readability and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) for understandability and actionability. Patient Handouts averaged a 4th-grade level (ages 7-8), 5th-grade level (ages 9-10), and 6th- to 7th-grade level (age 11+). Parent Handouts ranged from about 5th to nearly 7th grade. The PEMAT-P scores across all 23 handouts showed high understandability (92.3%) but lower actionability (60%). Overall, Bright Futures Handouts appear readable and understandable, supporting their use in pediatric practice, although opportunities remain to improve actionability. When clinicians create or evaluate patient education materials, attention to plain language, straightforward delivery, visual aids, and checklists helps improve readability, understandability, and actionability. These strategies may support more effective patient education and promote pediatric health outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...