Related Experiment Videos
Patient-reported outcomes in pediatric regional anesthesia trials: current use and limitations
Renee Ren1,2, Helen S Jung2,3, Michelle Carley4,5
1Department of Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Insights
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pediatric anesthesia research are inconsistently used, often relying on basic pain scales. Improved, standardized PROMs are needed for better recovery assessment.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesia
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Patient-centered outcomes are increasingly emphasized in pediatric research.
- Current assessment frameworks may not fully capture pain and daily living interference in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the use and limitations of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pediatric regional anesthesia.
- To identify gaps in current outcome assessment for pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials and ongoing studies in pediatric regional anesthesia.
- Analysis of the types and variability of PROMs utilized in identified research.
Main Results:
- PROM use in pediatric regional anesthesia research is highly variable.
- Consistent reliance on observational pain scales (e.g., FLACC) with limited use of standardized quality-of-life measures.
- 17 randomized controlled trials and 15 ongoing studies were analyzed.
Conclusions:
- Existing pediatric PROM frameworks are fragmented, hindering comprehensive recovery evaluation.
- There is a need for greater standardization and incorporation of developmentally appropriate, longitudinal outcome measures.
- Improved PROMs are essential for aligning research with patient-centered endpoints and assessing functional/psychosocial recovery.
Purpose Of Review:
This review examines the current use and limitations of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pediatric regional anesthesia research. Despite the increasing emphasis on patient-centered outcomes, existing pediatric outcome assessment frameworks may inadequately capture the pain experience and interference with daily living.
Recent Findings:
Across 17 identified randomized controlled trials and 15 ongoing studies, PROM use remains highly variable, with consistent reliance on observational pain scales such as the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale and limited incorporation of standardized, longitudinal health-related quality-of-life measures.
Summary:
Current pediatric PROM frameworks remain fragmented, limiting comprehensive evaluation of recovery. Greater standardization and incorporation of developmentally appropriate, longitudinal outcome measures are needed to better align clinical research with meaningful patient-centered endpoints and to improve assessment of functional and psychosocial recovery.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics