Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro
Published on: December 3, 2018
Autonomous Velocity Encoding (VENC) Selection Improves Precision of Quantitative Flow Measurement
Pierre Daudé1, Rajiv Ramasawmy1, Christine Mancini2
1Laboratory of Imaging Technology, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Background:
The optimal velocity encoding limit (VENC) in phase contrast MRI is subject-specific because it depends on peak flow rate and the presence of flow jets. Currently, VENC is set manually with limited prior knowledge of the peak velocity. Setting the correct VENC might improve measurement precision or shorten scan times.
Purpose:
To evaluate a workflow for autonomous selection of the optimal VENC without technologist interaction.
Study Type:
Prospective and retrospective.
Population:
The retrospective cohort included 254 scans from 113 patients (47 ± 14 years, 58 female) and 18 healthy volunteers (34 ± 15 years, 10 female). The prospective cohort included 5 patients with abnormal flow (47 ± 19 years, 2 female) and 10 healthy volunteers (28 ± 7 years, 6 female).
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5 T, 0.55 T; Cartesian gradient echo phase-contrast sequence.
Assessment:
A workflow has been designed to autonomously estimate and prescribe the optimal VENC. A 30s free-breathing calibration scan was followed by automatic estimation of the maximum velocity (Vmax) in < 6 s. The calculated optimal VENC was then automatically applied in the subsequent flow measurement without operator intervention. The target VENC:Vmax ratio was 1.1-1.25 according to consensus statements.
Statistical Tests:
Shapiro-Wilk test, nonparametric two-sided bootstrap with 90% confidence intervals, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, paired t-test. Holm correction was applied to prespecified pairwise comparisons. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
Retrospective analysis demonstrated sub-optimal VENC setting in 96.5% of examinations with a VENC:Vmax ratio [2.03, 2.13] (two-sided bootstrap 90% confidence interval). In the prospective cohort, autonomous inline VENC selection yielded a mean VENC:Vmax ratio of 1.19 ± 0.10, significantly lower than subject-invariant VENC settings (VENC150:Vmax = 1.49 ± 0.31, VENC200:Vmax = 1.99 ± 0.41). Optimized VENC improved measurement precision, reducing velocity standard deviation by 41.9% ± 8.0%, and enabling shorter scan time to approximately 1/3 compared with default VENC 200 cm/s while maintaining equivalent velocity-to-noise performance.
Data Conclusion:
Inline autonomous VENC selection improved flow-measurement precision, simplified the acquisition workflow, and reduced scan time at 0.55 T.
Evidence Level:
2.
Technical Efficacy:
1.
Related Concept Videos
Velocity and Acceleration in Steady and Unsteady Flow
The acceleration can be generalized to any point in the flow, and expressed as components along three perpendicular directions, representing changes in velocity over time.
Pipe Flowrate Measurement
The orifice meter is a simple,...
Average and Instantaneous Velocity Vectors
Rapidly Varying Flow
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Velocity and Position by Integral Method
Consider an example to calculate the velocity and position from the acceleration function. A motorboat is traveling at a constant velocity of 5.0 m/s when it starts to decelerate to arrive at the dock. Its acceleration is...

