Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro
Published on: December 3, 2018
Autonomous Velocity Encoding (VENC) Selection Improves Precision of Quantitative Flow Measurement
Pierre Daudé1, Rajiv Ramasawmy1, Christine Mancini2
1Laboratory of Imaging Technology, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Autonomous velocity encoding limit (VENC) selection in MRI improves flow measurement precision and reduces scan times. This automated workflow optimizes VENC settings without technologist input, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Cardiovascular Flow Measurement
Background:
- Optimal velocity encoding limit (VENC) in phase contrast MRI is crucial for accurate flow measurement but is subject-specific and often manually set.
- Current manual VENC setting relies on limited prior velocity data, potentially leading to suboptimal precision or extended scan times.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate an automated workflow for selecting the optimal VENC without requiring technologist interaction.
- To assess the impact of autonomous VENC selection on flow measurement precision and scan duration.
Main Methods:
- A prospective and retrospective study utilizing a 30-second free-breathing calibration scan to autonomously estimate maximum velocity (Vmax).
- The workflow automatically calculates and applies the optimal VENC, targeting a VENC:Vmax ratio of 1.1-1.25.
- Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk tests, bootstrap confidence intervals, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare VENC settings and measurement precision.
Main Results:
- Retrospective analysis revealed suboptimal VENC settings in 96.5% of examinations (VENC:Vmax ratio [2.03, 2.13]).
- Prospective autonomous VENC selection achieved a mean VENC:Vmax ratio of 1.19 ± 0.10, significantly lower than subject-invariant settings.
- Optimized VENC reduced velocity standard deviation by 41.9% ± 8.0% and enabled scan time reduction to approximately one-third compared to default settings.
Conclusions:
- Inline autonomous VENC selection significantly improves flow measurement precision.
- The automated workflow simplifies the MRI acquisition process.
- Autonomous VENC selection effectively reduces scan time at 0.55 T while maintaining velocity-to-noise performance.
Related Concept Videos
Velocity and Acceleration in Steady and Unsteady Flow
The acceleration can be generalized to any point in the flow, and expressed as components along three perpendicular directions, representing changes in velocity over time.
Pipe Flowrate Measurement
The orifice meter is a simple,...
Average and Instantaneous Velocity Vectors
Rapidly Varying Flow
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Velocity and Position by Integral Method
Consider an example to calculate the velocity and position from the acceleration function. A motorboat is traveling at a constant velocity of 5.0 m/s when it starts to decelerate to arrive at the dock. Its acceleration is...

