Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Assessing Intertidal Populations of the Invasive European Green Crab
Published on: September 16, 2020
Promoting equitable research: What Greenland teaches us about research ethics
Kristen Intemann1, Gitte Adler Reimer2, Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen3
1Center for Science, Technology, Ethics & Society, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Abstract:
Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) is increasingly becoming a site for international research to examine global climate change, biodiversity, deposits of rare earth elements, and various existing health disparities. Yet, there is no comprehensive code of ethical guidelines for responsible and culturally centered research there. International researchers conducting research in Kalaallit Nunaat are bound by research ethics regulations governed their home countries and institutions, but these are varied and, perhaps most importantly, were established independently of Kalaallit (Greenlanders). Consequently, in many cases, research in Kalaallit Nunaat has failed to benefit or prioritize populations there and, in some cases, has caused unintended harms. Here we provide an overview of some of the problems that have resulted from research in Kalaallit Nunaat. These problems were identified from 27 listening sessions held across Kalaallit Nunaat with community members, municipality leaders, and researchers over a five-year period (2020-2025). The themes that arose reveal certain key limitations with applying Western research ethics policies to the Kalaallit Nunaat context. Specifically, such policies tend to neglect research equity, reflect an individualistic rights-based framework of ethics that is limiting, and presuppose that only humans deserve moral consideration.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Ethics and Bioethics
Equity Theory
Naturalistic Observations
Archival Research
Ethical Dilemmas II
