Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
General practice closures or mergers: a survival analysis of contributing practice
Joseph Hutchinson1, Michael Anderson2, Rita Santos3
1Loughborough University, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (L5) joseph.hutchinson@manchester.ac.uk.
General practice closures in England are linked to contract type, location, and patient list size. Smaller practices and those with lower funding or quality face higher risks of closure or merger.
Area of Science:
- General Practice and Primary Care Research
- Health Services Research
- Health Policy Analysis
Background:
- General practices in England have experienced significant closures and mergers since 2013, impacting healthcare accessibility.
- Understanding the factors contributing to these closures is crucial for the sustainability and recovery of general practice.
- Previous research has highlighted negative impacts, but specific risk factors remain underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between practice characteristics (patient mix, location, workforce, funding, quality) and the risk of general practice closure or merger.
- To identify key predictors of general practice closure to inform strategies for practice recovery and stability.
- To analyze how various operational and demographic factors influence the future risk of general practice closure.
Main Methods:
- A multilevel survival analysis was conducted on all general practices in England open as of April 1, 2019, followed until April 1, 2025.
- Data on practice population characteristics, workforce, funding, and quality were collected and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
- The study examined the association between these measures and the time until practice closure or merger.
Main Results:
- Practice contract type and geographic location (region and rurality) were significant factors associated with closures, with closure rates varying significantly by region.
- Smaller practices (e.g., 3,032 patients) exhibited a substantially higher risk (253%) of closure or merger compared to median-sized practices (7,256 patients).
- Increased risk was also linked to patient list decline, lower baseline funding, poorer clinical quality, higher socioeconomic deprivation, and specific contract types; GP or nurse supply was not a significant factor.
Conclusions:
- Practice contract, geographic region, practice list size, funding levels, and clinical quality are identified as critical hazards for general practice closure or merger.
- These findings underscore the importance of considering practice-specific operational and contextual factors in strategies aimed at preventing closures.
- The study provides evidence to support targeted interventions and policy adjustments to enhance the resilience and sustainability of general practices.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Kaplan-Meier Approach