Management and outcomes of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Farzad Pourghazi1, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi2, Takahiro Matsuo3

  • 1Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Insights

Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (CN-PJI) treatment has a high success rate, especially with exchange arthroplasty. Further research is needed for standardized management of this challenging condition.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medical Microbiology

Background:

  • Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (CN-PJI) presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic hurdles.
  • Current management often relies on empirical antimicrobial and surgical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze treatment strategies and outcomes for CN-PJI.
  • To identify factors influencing treatment success and failure in CN-PJI patients.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 cohort studies.
  • Inclusion of 1399 patients diagnosed with CN-PJI.
  • Searches conducted in MEDLINE and Scopus databases up to July 3, 2025.

Main Results:

  • Pooled treatment success proportion of 83.6% (95% CI, 78.2-87.9).
  • Pooled failure proportion of 17.2% (95% CI, 12.6-22.9) and mortality of 2.4% (95% CI, 1.3-4.6).
  • Exchange arthroplasty demonstrated higher success rates than debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention; hip CN-PJI had better outcomes than knee CN-PJI.

Conclusions:

  • CN-PJI can achieve favorable outcomes, particularly with exchange arthroplasty.
  • Significant heterogeneity in antimicrobial regimens precludes pooled analysis.
  • Prospective studies with standardized definitions and reporting are essential for advancing CN-PJI management.