Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

05:49
An Automated Squint Method for Time-syncing Behavior and Brain Dynamics in Mouse Pain Studies
Published on: November 1, 2024
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Strabismus with and without Amblyopia from Fixation Eye Movements
Kevin Xu1, Archayeeta Rakshit2, Fatema Ghasia2
1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ophthalmology Science
|August 8, 2026
Summary
Machine learning models accurately differentiate strabismic amblyopia from strabismus and controls using fixation eye movement (FEM) features. This technology shows promise for objective diagnosis and screening of visual disorders.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Computer Science
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Strabismic amblyopia and strabismus are common visual impairments.
- Objective diagnostic methods are crucial for timely intervention.
- Current diagnostic approaches may have limitations in differentiating these conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate machine learning (ML) models trained on fixation eye movement (FEM) features.
- To determine if ML models can differentiate strabismic amblyopia, strabismus without amblyopia, and visually normal controls.
- To identify key FEM features predictive of these conditions.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 159 subjects (amblyopia, strabismus, controls).
- Recorded horizontal and vertical eye-position traces during monocular viewing.
- Computed various FEM metrics including fixation instability, eye deviation, and vergence instability.
- Trained multiple ML models for six binary classification tasks.
- Utilized Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify predictive features.
Main Results:
- ML models achieved high accuracy in distinguishing moderate/severe strabismic amblyopia from strabismus (0.81 ± 0.09) and controls (0.90 ± 0.07).
- Strong performance was also observed in classifying strabismus versus controls (0.90 ± 0.07) and amblyopia versus controls (0.90 ± 0.07).
- SHAP analysis indicated that viewing amblyopic eye abnormalities were key predictors of amblyopia, while nonviewing-eye FEM metrics and binocular coordination features predicted strabismus.
Conclusions:
- FEM features combined with ML can objectively distinguish strabismic amblyopia from strabismus and controls.
- The strongest performance was noted in moderate/severe disease.
- Future research should focus on younger populations and portable eye-tracking for scalable screening.
