Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026
A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
Published on: September 25, 2014
The Criteria and Design for Return-to-Play Following Muscle Injury in Football are Not Standardized: A Systematic
Óscar Vicente1, Olga Velasco-Roldan2,3,4, Carles Pedret5
1Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma de Mallorca, Spain. ovrodriguez@atleticodemadrid.com.
Background And Objective:
Return-to-play (RTP) decisions after muscle injury in professional football are complex, influenced by biological healing, functional recovery, and sport-specific demands. RTP models have evolved towards multifactorial and individualized frameworks; however, supporting evidence remains largely consensus-based. This systematic review aimed to describe RTP criteria and study design heterogeneity and integration within RTP frameworks in football.
Methods:
This study was conducted as a systematic review. Studies investigating RTP criteria, RTP decision-making, or rehabilitation frameworks following muscle injuries in football players were included. Searches were performed in five databases. Two reviewers assessed risk of bias using Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. Ten studies included were classified as Classical-Physical, Consensus-Multifactorial, or Individualized RTP models.
Results:
Studies reported a median of six RTP criteria (range 4-8); most commonly the absence of pain, ≥ 90% strength symmetry, and functional testing. Psychological readiness and GPS/on-field monitoring were reported after 2020 and were more frequent in multifactorial and individualized frameworks. A gradual shift towards multifactorial and individualized RTP frameworks was observed. No significant associations were identified between RTP model classification and individual RTP criteria (p > 0.05). Reinjury outcomes were rarely reported.
Conclusions:
The literature shows heterogeneity in RTP criteria and study design after muscle injury, with consensus-based and low-level evidence predominating. RTP decision-making is grounded in expert opinion rather than outcome validation. RTP is a dynamic, multifactorial, and context-dependent process, integrating biological healing, functional recovery, psychological readiness, and load tolerance. Future research should prioritize prospective validation of integrated RTP frameworks and standardized outcome reporting.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD420251250364.
More Related Videos
05:48Autonomic Function Following Concussion in Youth Athletes: An Exploration of Heart Rate Variability Using 24-hour Recording Methodology
Published on: September 21, 2018
06:52An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020