Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
A covered benefit with an untrusted on-ramp: Why medicare principal illness navigation still is not reaching patients
Joseph A Bauer1, Betty Goodwin2, Aimee Dundas2
1Bauer Research Foundation, Inc., 3465 S. Arlington Road, Unit E, No. 135, Akron, OH 44312-5272, United States; Cancer Care Concierge™ + Chronic Care Concierge™ which is a division within the Bauer Research Foundation, Inc., 3465 S. Arlington Road, Unit E, No. 135, Akron, OH 44312-5272, United States.
Abstract:
Principal Illness Navigation (PIN) represents an important Medicare policy advance, but coverage has not translated reliably into access. PIN addresses a real need: patients with cancer and other serious chronic illnesses often struggle with fragmented communication, scheduling complexity, insurance confusion, caregiver burden, and uncertainty about next steps. Medicare recognizes PIN under Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) Level II codes G0023 and G0024, with payment established through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Yet the main barriers to PIN implementation are administrative and operational rather than clinical. The billing practitioner must perform an initiating visit and remains responsible for supervision, documentation, and billing, even when auxiliary personnel furnishing navigation are external to the practice. Many private practices and oncology groups lack the infrastructure or patient volume to employ dedicated navigators. Specialized outside navigation organizations may offer a scalable alternative, but contracting, enrollment, and billing remain difficult; reassignment adds further friction when an eligible organization seeks to submit claims and receive Medicare Part B payment. This commentary argues that PIN's implementation challenges reflect not only physician education gaps but also a broader trust problem in the administrative pathway. Historical warnings from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General help explain physician caution. Experience from other Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services programs, including the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program and the Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE) Model, shows that CMS can modify delivery rules and formally evaluate implementation when operational barriers emerge. To make PIN function as a real benefit rather than a paper benefit, CMS should provide plain-language guidance, clarify risk boundaries, simplify enrollment and payment pathways, and measure activation, onboarding time, and successful service delivery.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Patient-centered Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities