Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

05:56
Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016
Oral Riboflavin for Sunlight-Induced Corneal Cross-linking: Efficacy Assessment in a Rabbit Model In Vivo Using
Emilio A Torres-Netto1,2, M Enes Aydemir1, Nan-Ji Lu1,3,4
1ELZA Institute, Zurich, Switzerland.
Journal of Refractive Surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
|August 10, 2026
Summary
This study investigated oral riboflavin and sunlight for keratoconus treatment. The non-invasive method did not stiffen corneas, suggesting it
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Corneal Science
Background:
- Keratoconus is a progressive eye condition causing thinning and bulging of the cornea.
- Standard corneal cross-linking (CXL) stiffens the cornea to halt progression but is invasive.
- Exploring non-invasive, cost-effective alternatives for keratoconus treatment is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a non-invasive approach using oral riboflavin and natural sunlight for keratoconus treatment.
- To determine if this method offers a cost-effective alternative to standard CXL.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, controlled study in New Zealand White rabbits.
- Quantified stromal riboflavin levels after oral administration.
- Assessed corneal biomechanics using optical coherence tomography (OCT) elastography and uniaxial stress-strain extensometry after sunlight exposure.
Main Results:
- Oral riboflavin administration resulted in low stromal riboflavin concentrations, significantly lower than standard CXL.
- No significant corneal stiffening was observed in rabbits treated with oral riboflavin and sunlight compared to controls.
- OCT elastography indicated increased posterior corneal strain in treated eyes, suggesting reduced apparent stiffness.
Conclusions:
- Oral riboflavin combined with natural sunlight did not induce corneal stiffening in the tested rabbit model.
- The low stromal riboflavin levels suggest this approach is unlikely to be an effective standalone keratoconus treatment.
- Observed changes may indicate stromal degradation or subthreshold effects rather than true cross-linking.
