Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
Published on: August 17, 2015
Investigating the relationship between relative accuracy and linearity acceptance criteria in bioassay validation for
Pietro Piu1, Stefano Auddino1, Gioele Bernardoni1
1VisMederi S.r.l., Monteriggioni, Italy.
Background:
Relative accuracy (RA) and linearity are distinct validation characteristics in bioassay validation, yet quantitative relationships between their acceptance criteria are rarely defined. This study investigated how predefined RA tolerances determine admissible linearity acceptance ranges.
Research Design And Methods:
A theoretical framework for assessing dilutional linearity was established using a b-fold serial dilution design. Relative accuracy was defined as the ratio of observed to expected geometric means, evaluated against a tolerance threshold (θ). Linearity was determined through linear regression of logb(GMobserved) against logb(Dilution). Analytical expressions were derived for acceptable slope intervals based on θ and the number of valid dilution levels. A simulated bioassay dataset illustrated its application.
Results:
Analytical derivations showed that admissible slope intervals depend exclusively on θ and the number of valid dilution levels. The resulting limits were invariant with respect to both the initial geometric mean and the dilution fold factor. In the illustrative example, the proposed framework supported acceptance of linearity while retaining all valid dilution levels.
Conclusions:
This study provides a mathematically consistent method for deriving linearity acceptance criteria directly from predefined RA requirements. Although illustrated using simulated data, it offers a tool for dilution-based bioassay validation and may support more coherent validation decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
