Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A High-Throughput Electrochemiluminescence 7-Plex Assay Simultaneously Screening for Type 1 Diabetes and Multiple Autoimmune Diseases
Published on: May 29, 2020
Glucometer versus standard enzymatic method for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for diagnostic
Laarni Hannah Lacorte1,2, Wilfredo Quijencio2, Lucylynn Lizarondo3
1School of Advanced Studies, De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines.
Background:
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major obstetric complication associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Although the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the diagnostic gold standard, its implementation is often constrained by logistical, financial, and infrastructural limitations, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Point-of-care (POC) glucometers offer a rapid and accessible alternative; however, their diagnostic accuracy in pregnant populations remains uncertain.
Methods:
This systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for diagnostic test accuracy reviews. Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, as well as gray literature sources, were searched for studies published from 2013 to March 2025. Eligible studies included pregnant women screened for GDM using POC glucometers compared with OGTT as the reference standard. Data on diagnostic performance and methodological quality were extracted and assessed using JBI and QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tools. Due to substantial heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively.
Results:
Six studies comprising 2856 pregnant women were included. Reported sensitivity ranged from 27.0% to 100%, while specificity ranged from 31.5% to 98.8%. Diagnostic performance varied widely depending on device type, enzymatic method, calibration of diagnostic thresholds, and pre-analytical handling. Studies employing validated enzymatic methods and calibrated capillary thresholds demonstrated higher accuracy, whereas unadjusted cut-offs and inconsistent procedures were associated with poor performance.
Conclusion:
Point-of-care glucometers may serve as alternative tools for GDM diagnosis in resource-constrained settings; however, their reliability is highly dependent on procedural rigor and threshold validation. Further standardized, high-quality studies are required before routine clinical adoption can be recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Hyperglycemia
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility, suggesting a...
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Diabetes Mellitus: Introduction
