Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
A Decision-Making Framework for Selecting Intimate Partner Violence Measures in Health Research
Jessica Roberts Williams1, Candace W Burton2, Gabrielle G Grant1
1School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Summary
Selecting the right intimate partner violence (IPV) measure is crucial for health research. This study introduces a framework and checklist to guide researchers in choosing the most appropriate IPV measurement tools.
Area of Science:
- Health Research Methodology
- Public Health Measurement
- Social Sciences
Background:
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) measurement in health research is complex due to diverse measures.
- Selecting appropriate IPV measures requires balancing study goals with conceptual, ethical, and practical factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a decision-making framework for selecting IPV measures in health research.
- To aid researchers in choosing the most suitable IPV measurement tools for their studies.
Main Methods:
- A targeted review of systematic reviews on IPV measures was conducted.
- A consensus-driven approach appraised reviews to identify common criteria for categorizing and evaluating IPV measures.
- Key measurement characteristics and common challenges were identified.
Main Results:
- Six core domains for characterizing IPV measures were identified: purpose, populations, types of violence, time frame, context, and data collection methods.
- Additional characteristics like psychometric evidence, cultural relevance, language availability, and respondent burden were noted.
- A decision-making framework and checklist were developed to assist researchers in evaluating measure fit.
Conclusions:
- Structured guidance enhances intentional and transparent decision-making in IPV measurement.
- The framework and checklist improve the quality, fit, consistency, and rigor of IPV measurement in research and clinical settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
01:25Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods: