Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

08:45
Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
Published on: March 28, 2018
Bridging clinical and computational assessments: Standardizing kinematic reporting in modified mallet scale movements
Ali İmran Yalçın1,2,3, Oğuz Faik Seven4, Merve Sarıipek5
1Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Plos One
|August 10, 2026
Summary
Choosing the right Euler sequence is crucial for accurate shoulder movement analysis in brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) assessments using the Modified Mallet Scale (MMS). Standardizing kinematic reporting enhances clinical reliability.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Accurate shoulder kinematics assessment is vital for brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) management.
- Current kinematic reporting methods lack standardization, impacting data reliability.
- The Modified Mallet Scale (MMS) is a key clinical tool for evaluating BPBI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the optimal Euler sequence for reporting shoulder kinematics during MMS movements.
- To evaluate kinematic data discontinuities and amplitude coherence across different Euler sequences.
- To establish standardized reporting methods for improved clinical relevance in BPBI research.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of kinematic data from unaffected arms of ten children with BPBI.
- Utilized inertial measurement units for data collection.
- Quantified discontinuities (gimbal lock, phase angle) and evaluated amplitude coherence for ZXY, XZY, and YXY Euler sequences.
Main Results:
- The ZXY sequence exhibited gimbal lock in key MMS movements (M1, M2, M3).
- XZY and YXY sequences showed no gimbal lock, though YXY had phase angle discontinuities.
- Amplitude coherence analysis indicated XZY and YXY were most suitable for M1/M2, YXY for M3/M5, XZY for M4, and ZXY for M6.
Conclusions:
- The choice of Euler sequence significantly impacts the accuracy of MMS movement analysis.
- Movement-specific, standardized kinematic reporting is essential to reduce discontinuities and maintain amplitude coherence.
- Standardization will enhance clinical relevance and enable meaningful cross-study comparisons in BPBI evaluation.
