Related Experiment Videos
Maternal Health Infrastructure Investments in Zambia: Leveraging Geospatial Evidence to Inform Planning and
Emmanuel Katyoka1, Kutha Banda1, Jason Wamulume2
1Clinton Health Access Initiative.
Health Policy and Planning
|August 10, 2026
Summary
Geospatial analysis in Zambia identified priority sites for maternal health infrastructure, reducing investment needs by over 90% and improving access to care for rural mothers.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Geospatial Analysis
- Health Systems Strengthening
Background:
- Maternal health inequities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are exacerbated by poor spatial access to healthcare facilities.
- In Zambia, a high maternal mortality ratio (187 per 100,000 live births) is linked to delays in seeking, reaching, and receiving care, particularly in rural areas.
- Significant portions of the rural population in Zambia live beyond the recommended 5-kilometer radius from health facilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe a geospatial prioritization approach for guiding investments in maternal health infrastructure in Zambia.
- To identify high-priority sites for new facilities and upgrades to improve maternal healthcare access and continuity of care.
- To optimize the impact of limited resources for maternal health infrastructure development.
Main Methods:
- A geospatial prioritization approach was applied using cross-sectional data from 692 public health facilities in Zambia's Eastern and Southern Provinces.
- Data integration included routine Health Management Information System (HMIS) data, maternal mortality records, facility infrastructure assessments, and geospatial analysis.
- Facilities were screened using eligibility criteria for maternal deaths and ranked using a weighted scoring model based on infrastructure readiness for maternal care continuity.
Main Results:
- While labor and delivery services are widespread, capacity for recommended 48-hour postnatal observation care is inadequate.
- Maternal deaths were concentrated in a small percentage of facilities (28% in Eastern Province, 19% in Southern Province).
- The prioritization framework reduced the number of potential investment sites from 606 to 27 high-priority facilities, cutting projected costs from US$41.8 million to approximately US$2 million.
Conclusions:
- Targeted infrastructure investments, informed by geospatial and routine health system data, can enhance equity and continuity of maternal care.
- The applied framework offers a practical and scalable model for evidence-informed infrastructure planning in resource-constrained settings.
- This approach optimizes the impact of limited resources, addressing critical gaps in maternal healthcare delivery.