Identifying an optimal inter-twin weight discordance cutoff for predicting donor survival after fetoscopic laser
Manasa G Rao1, Christy Gandhi2, Noelle Breslin3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY (Rao, Ingrassia, Simpson, and Miller).
Background:
Increased inter-twin growth discordance has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. An inter-twin growth discordance of at least 25% is often considered as a clinical threshold for pathological discordance in unselected monochorionic-diamniotic (MCDA) twins, but an optimal cutoff for predicting survival outcomes following fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is unclear.
Objectives:
This study aimed to (1) compare outcomes of FLS for TTTS based upon on the presence or absence of discordance ≥25%, (2) evaluate the association of different inter-twin discordance thresholds on donor twin survival after FLS, and (3) identify an optimal discordance cutoff for the prediction of donor twin survival.
Study Design:
Retrospective review of MCDA twins with TTTS that underwent FLS at a single center from 2009 to 2022. The primary outcome was donor twin survival at first sonogram after FLS. Pregnancies with preoperative inter-twin discordance ≥25% were compared to those <25%. Differing thresholds of inter-twin discordance were compared to determine predictive accuracy for donor twin survival, and discordance was examined as a continuous variable to determine an optimal cutoff for donor twin survival prediction.
Results:
A total of 169 MCDA pregnancies underwent FLS and met inclusion criteria and 62 (37%) had inter-twin discordance ≥25%. Patients with inter-twin discordance ≥25% were younger (32±5 years vs 30±6 years, p=.03). Gestational age at TTTS diagnosis and at FLS were similar between groups. Donor twin selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) was more likely with discordance ≥25% (74.2% vs 23.4%, p<.01). Pre-FLS Quintero stage differed between the 2 groups (p=.014), with higher likelihood of stage III and IV disease in the ≥25% group. Discordance ≥25% was associated with lower donor twin survival at first post-FLS sonogram (75.8% vs 89.7%, p=.02) and at newborn hospital discharge (52.8% vs 73.6%, p=.04). After adjusting for age, Quintero stage, and donor FGR, donor twin survival at first sonogram remained lower in patients with discordance ≥25% (p=.01). Discordance cutoffs of ≥25% and ≥30% were significantly associated with decreased donor twin survival at first sonogram post-FLS (p=.03 and p<.001, respectively) and this was true after adjusting for donor fetal growth restriction and pre-FLS Quintero stage. In fitting a logistic regression model, discordance as a continuous variable was significantly associated with predicting donor twin survival (p=.02). The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting donor twin survival was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.74, p=.06). Based on the Youden index, the optimum cut point was a discordance of 29%, which had a sensitivity of 0.75, specificity of 0.58, positive predictive value of 0.91, and negative predictive value of 0.29 for predicting donor twin survival.
Conclusion:
Discordance ≥25% was associated with lower donor twin survival after FLS for TTTS; however, inter-twin discordance alone is a poor predictor of donor twin survival after FLS for TTTS. If it is to be considered for use in clinical practice, a cutoff value of 29% was most predictive of donor twin survival in this cohort and may be useful for preoperative counseling on expected outcomes.
