Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Automated Hospital Room Disinfection Utilizing a Novel Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide Microdroplet Disbursing Technology
Published on: February 24, 2026
Environmental Impact of a Novel UV-C Disinfection Machine for Non-Channel Flexible Laryngoscopes
Abhishek Mahesh1, Paul C Bryson2
1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA.
Objectives:
Infection prevention in hospitals is a highly discussed and regulated process for endoscopy in Otolaryngology. The current standard for endoscopes involves high level disinfection (HLD). The UV-SMART D60 disinfection machine utilizes Impelux UV-C light technology. This study aimed to evaluate the environmental impact of the D60 machine within an otolaryngology department in comparison to current HLD protocols.
Methods:
Three equipment, materials, and disposables audits were conducted where the turnover and HLD process of a single non-channeled laryngoscope was analyzed. Every item involved in the cleaning process was documented for both standard HLD and D60 workflows. Water quantity was documented and a power meter was used to determine the wattage of the machinery used. Additionally, scope turnover time was documented and CO2 emissions were calculated from known quantities.
Results:
Results demonstrated a significant reduction in material usage with the D60 including reduced PPE. The total water usage was about 45 L more per scope for traditional HLD. Power analysis demonstrated a reduction of 250 watts per scope. Additionally, the D60 reduced CO2 emissions by over a factor of 3500. Scope turnover time was 109 min less for the D60.
Conclusions:
Environmental analysis demonstrates a significant amount of usage of disposables, water, and energy per non-channeled nasolaryngoscope with current HLD protocols. UV-C HLD resulted in less consumption of these resources. The marked reduction in turnover time and scope handling represents a significant opportunity for clinical efficiency, cost reduction, and resource consumption and will merit further investigation when FDA approval is granted.
Level Of Evidence:
N/A.
Related Concept Videos
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
