Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Integration of Bioinformatics Approaches and Experimental Validations to Understand the Role of Notch Signaling in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: January 12, 2020
OverlappING and DivergING roles of ING4 and ING5 in cancer, differentiation and development
Sergey Dadoyan1,2,3, Tom J Bartizal1,2,3, Sakunika Amarsingha4,5
1Robson DNA Sciences Centre, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Abstract:
The INhibitor of Growth (ING) proteins are plant homeodomain (PHD) zinc-finger epigenetic readers that recognize trimethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4me3) and couple it to lysine-acetyltransferase (KAT) or -deacetylase (KDAC) activity on chromatin. ING4 and ING5 are among the family's closest paralogs, which share a four-domain architecture and high sequence identity, with divergence concentrated outside the PHD finger. Earlier reviews focused either on the family as a whole or on the individual INGs. This paper is the first to directly compare ING4 and ING5, including their structures, functions within KAT complexes, and roles in cancer and development, noting where they overlap and diverge. Either paralog can occupy the ING position in HBO1 (KAT7) complexes, whereas only ING5 is found in MOZ and MORF (KAT6A/B) complexes. In cancers, ING4 and ING5 generally act as tumor suppressors but can also promote malignancy and stemness. The bulk of evidence for mechanistically explaining the effects of ING4/5 in cancers comes from ectopic overexpression studies. In differentiation, ING5 has been investigated far more than ING4, and the roles of the two mostly diverge: ING5 participates in maintaining stemness in neural, epidermal, and brain tumor initiating cell lines, as well as proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells, whereas ING4 was found to restrain hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal, promote prostate epithelial differentiation, but promote stemness of renal cell carcinoma cells. They nonetheless compensate for one another in embryonic survival, since either paralog alone prevents the arrest seen in double knockouts. The key remaining questions include what determines the structural basis of ING5's MOZ/MORF selectivity, what the precise conditions are under which they substitute for one another, how exactly ING4 and ING5 can be targeted in cancer therapy, and whether the roles of the two paralogs are conserved across species.
Related Concept Videos
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Role Of Notch Signalling In Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal
Direct cell-to-cell contact is needed for the activation of Notch signaling. The signal is initiated when a notch ligand binds to a receptor on an adjacent cell, also...
Cancer Cell Migration through Invadopodia
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Maintenance
Cancer stem cells are thought to originate from tissue-specific normal stem cells or progenitor cells. The normal stem cells usually reside in...
