Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
Published on: May 24, 2022
Advancing endodontic imaging: a high-resolution comparison between CBCT and micro-CT in the danger zone
Gabriel de Toledo Telles-Araujo1, Raimundo Sales de Oliveira Neto2, Mariana Quirino Silveira Soares3
1School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Objective:
This study evaluated the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols for measuring submillimetric dentin thickness in the danger zone (DZ) of mandibular molars, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) as the reference standard.
Materials And Methods:
Fifty-one extracted mandibular molars were scanned using micro-CT and two CBCT devices under different acquisition protocols (Standard, High Fidelity, High Resolution [HIRE], and Imaging System [i-CAT]). After three-dimensional image registration, dentin thickness in the DZ, located 2 mm below the furcation, was measured in both mesial canals.
Results:
All CBCT protocols significantly underestimated dentin thickness compared with micro-CT (p < 0.05), with discrepancies ranging from 4.5 to 8.6%. Underestimation was more pronounced in the mesiolingual canal. The HIRE protocol (0.125 mm voxel size) showed the smallest discrepancy, whereas the i-CAT protocol showed the largest.
Conclusions:
CBCT systematically underestimates dentin thickness in the DZ and is not metrically equivalent to micro-CT for submillimetric measurements. Measurement accuracy is influenced by acquisition parameters and cannot be explained by voxel size alone.
