Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
Sander Rm Bus1, Luuk Wieske1, Stephen Keddie2
1Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) maintenance therapy likely reduces disability worsening in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) compared to placebo. While SCIg may improve strength and disability scores, it increases local side effects.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Immunology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated neuropathy causing progressive weakness and sensory loss.
- Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a standard first-line treatment for CIDP.
- Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) offers potential advantages in administration and patient quality of life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) for induction and maintenance treatment in CIDP.
- To compare SCIg against placebo or other interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing SCIg with placebo or other treatments in probable or definite CIDP.
- Primary outcomes: improvement in disability (induction) and clinically significant deterioration in disability (maintenance).
- Secondary outcomes: grip strength, disability scores, and adverse effects; assessed using Cochrane risk of bias and GRADE criteria.
Main Results:
- SCIg maintenance therapy likely reduces disability deterioration versus placebo (RR 0.40, moderate certainty).
- SCIg likely improves grip strength and disability scores compared to placebo (moderate certainty).
- SCIg is associated with a probable increase in local adverse effects but no difference in systemic effects (moderate certainty).
Conclusions:
- Evidence for SCIg as induction therapy is lacking; its efficacy versus IVIg remains unclear.
- SCIg maintenance therapy appears effective in reducing disability worsening and improving function, with manageable local side effects.
- Further RCTs are needed to compare SCIg with placebo/other induction treatments and to assess its long-term benefits against other maintenance therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
