Single-port vs. multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: an umbrella review of meta-analyses

Lalit Kumar1, Atanu Kumar Pal2, Yuhong Yuan3

  • 1Department of Urology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. lalitkumarims@bhu.ac.in.

Insights

Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) offers faster recovery and better cosmetic results than multi-port RARP (MP-RARP). Oncological and functional outcomes remain comparable, but more high-quality studies are needed.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) is a minimally invasive approach.
  • It aims to reduce surgical morbidity compared to multi-port RARP (MP-RARP).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize and critically appraise meta-analytic evidence comparing SP-RARP and MP-RARP.
  • To evaluate perioperative, functional, oncological, cosmetic, and economic outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Umbrella review of meta-analyses comparing SP-RARP and MP-RARP.
  • Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases.
  • Methodological quality assessed using AMSTAR-2.

Main Results:

  • SP-RARP showed shorter hospital stays, smaller incisions, less pain, and reduced opioid use.
  • Operative time, blood loss, and complication rates were comparable.
  • Urinary continence, potency, positive surgical margins, and biochemical recurrence were equivalent.

Conclusions:

  • SP-RARP is a safe and feasible alternative to MP-RARP, improving recovery and cosmesis.
  • Oncological and functional outcomes are not compromised.
  • High-quality prospective studies are needed due to limited evidence certainty.

Related Concept Videos