Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019
Surgical management and outcomes in localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma: a National Cancer Database Study
Hue T T Tran1, Duc V Le1, Raslina Shrestha2
1Mayo Clinic, Department of Dermatology, Rochester, MN, USA; National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
None:
We evaluated factors associated with positive surgical margins and overall survival in localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma using the National Cancer Database (2004-2023). Patients with localized vulvar basal cell carcinoma undergoing surgical resection were included. Multi-variable logistic regression identified factors associated with positive margins. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multi-variable Cox regression. Among 2998 patients, 249 (8.3%) had positive margins. Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.022 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.008 to 1.035), tumor size >20 mm (aOR 2.451, 95% CI 1.169 to 5.139), basosquamous histology (aOR 1.873, 95% CI 1.071 to 3.275), and organ-sparing surgery (aOR 2.224, 95% CI 1.686 to 2.933) were independently associated with positive margins. Five-year overall survival was 81.79% after organ-sparing surgery, 82.75% after partial vulvectomy, and 73.30% after radical vulvectomy (log-rankp= .0013). In adjusted analyses, organ-sparing surgery was not associated with worse overall survival compared with partial vulvectomy, whereas radical vulvectomy was associated with worse survival (aHR 1.348; 95% CI 1.034 to 1.757). Organ-sparing surgery is associated with higher odds of positive margins but is not associated with worse overall survival in adjusted analyses compared with partial vulvectomy. These findings may help inform surgical decision-making in vulvar basal cell carcinoma.