Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

04:59
Rotating the Intraocular Lens to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification in Cataract Surgeries
Published on: July 7, 2023
Refractive Predictability of Third-Generation and Modern IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Yamane Intrascleral
Mehmet Icoz1, Burak Tanriverdi2, Mehmet Yakin2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Yozgat City Hospital, Yozgat, Turkey.
American Journal of Ophthalmology
|August 11, 2026
Summary
All intraocular lens(IOL) power calculation formulas showed a hyperopic shift after Yamane intrascleral fixation(YISF). Post-optimization, both modern and third-generation formulas offered similar refractive predictability, highlighting the impact of surgical variability.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Refractive Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Yamane intrascleral fixation (YISF) is a technique used for IOL implantation in cases of aphakia or IOL subluxation.
- Accurate refractive prediction is crucial for successful visual outcomes after YISF.
- Evaluating the performance of different IOL power calculation formulas in this specific surgical context is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the refractive predictability of third-generation and modern IOL power calculation formulas following YISF.
- To assess the impact of formula optimization on refractive outcomes in eyes undergoing YISF.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 87 eyes undergoing YISF was conducted.
- Six IOL power calculation formulas were evaluated: third-generation (Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, T2) and modern (Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0).
- Refractive predictability was assessed using mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and proportions of eyes within ±0.50D and ±1.00D, before and after constant optimization.
Main Results:
- All formulas initially showed a hyperopic shift (ME +0.55D to +0.71D) with no significant differences in ME, MAE, or MedAE.
- SRK/T, BUII, and EVO 2.0 formulas had a higher proportion of eyes within ±0.50D pre-optimization.
- After constant optimization, all formulas demonstrated similar refractive performance, with no significant differences in MAE, MedAE, or refractive outcomes.
Conclusions:
- A consistent hyperopic shift was observed with all tested formulas after YISF.
- While some formulas showed initial advantages, all demonstrated comparable refractive predictability after constant optimization.
- Refractive outcomes after YISF are significantly influenced by intraoperative factors affecting the actual IOL position.