Related Experiment Videos
Restoring Mouth Opening in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scoping Review of Interventions
Beatriz Borba Barros Bernardo1, Lucas Nascimento Ribeiro2,3, Luiz Alcino Monteiro Gueiros4
1Department of Clinical and Preventive Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Oral Diseases
|August 12, 2026
Summary
This review maps treatments for microstomia in systemic sclerosis, finding most evidence supports non-surgical methods like physiotherapy. Further research needs standardized outcomes and study designs for better treatment clarity.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Dermatology
- Oral Medicine
Background:
- Microstomia is a common complication of systemic sclerosis, significantly impacting quality of life.
- Limited understanding exists regarding the comprehensive landscape of therapeutic strategies for managing microstomia in systemic sclerosis patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically map and characterize existing therapeutic strategies for microstomia management in systemic sclerosis.
- To identify gaps and heterogeneity in the current literature on microstomia treatments.
Main Methods:
- A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
- Searches encompassed major databases (Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) and gray literature.
- Included studies focused on adult systemic sclerosis patients with interventions for microstomia and reported mouth opening outcomes.
Main Results:
- Forty-five studies were included, predominantly featuring non-surgical interventions (physiotherapy, injectables, oral medications).
- Surgical treatments, mainly autologous fat grafting, were less common.
- Evidence primarily consists of conservative interventions in randomized controlled trials and surgical approaches in quasi-experimental studies, with significant heterogeneity observed.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence for microstomia management in systemic sclerosis relies heavily on non-surgical approaches and exhibits considerable methodological heterogeneity.
- Standardized outcome measures, extended follow-up periods, and robust multicenter studies are crucial for future research.
- Further investigation is needed to clarify the roles of both conservative and surgical treatments.