Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Sensitivity analysis for contamination in egocentric-network randomized trials with interference
1Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Abstract:
Egocentric-network randomized trials (ENRTs) are increasingly used to estimate causal effects under interference when measuring complete sociocentric network data is infeasible. ENRTs rely on egocentric network sampling, where a set of egos is first sampled, and each ego recruits a subset of its neighbors as alters. Treatments are then randomized across egos. While the observed ego-networks are disjoint by design, the underlying population network may contain edges connecting them, leading to contamination. Under a design-based framework, we show that the Horvitz-Thompson estimators of direct and indirect effects are biased whenever contamination is present. To address this, we derive bias-corrected estimators and propose a novel sensitivity analysis framework based on sensitivity parameters representing the probability or expected number of missing edges. This framework is implemented via both grid sensitivity analysis and probabilistic bias analysis, providing researchers with a flexible tool to assess the robustness of the causal estimators to contamination. We apply our methodology to the HIV Prevention Trials Network 037 study, finding that ignoring contamination may lead to underestimation of indirect effects and overestimation of direct effects.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Censoring Survival Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Random and Systematic Errors