Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Relationship between subendocardial viability ratio and cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients
Lingxiao Wang1,2, Jianxiong Chen3,4, Xinqi Wang3,5
1Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Insights
The subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) is lower in hypertensive individuals and independently predicts 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. This noninvasive marker can enhance cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- The subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) correlates with coronary flow reserve and serves as a potential indirect prognostic marker for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- Hypertension is a major risk factor for CVD, necessitating improved methods for risk assessment and stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between SEVR and established cardiovascular risk scores.
- To evaluate the utility of SEVR in identifying increased cardiovascular risk, particularly in a hypertensive population.
Main Methods:
- 1,380 participants (782 hypertensive, 598 normotensive) were analyzed for demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic data.
- 10-year atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk was calculated using the China-PAR model.
- Multivariable regression analyses identified determinants of SEVR and factors associated with high ASCVD risk (>10%).
Main Results:
- Mean SEVR was significantly lower in hypertensive patients compared to controls (130.75% vs. 136.38%, P<0.001).
- SEVR was independently associated with a 10-year ASCVD risk >10% (OR=0.953, P<0.001), even after adjusting for conventional risk factors.
- Lower SEVR levels were observed in high-risk individuals within both hypertensive and control groups, indicating its role in risk stratification.
Conclusions:
- SEVR is inversely associated with 10-year ASCVD risk in hypertensive individuals and serves as an independent predictor.
- As a noninvasive marker reflecting myocardial oxygen supply-demand balance, SEVR can complement existing risk assessment models.
- SEVR holds potential for refining cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients.
Background:
The subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), which correlates with coronary flow reserve, has been proposed as an indirect prognostic marker for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between SEVR and cardiovascular risk scores, and to evaluate its value in identifying increased cardiovascular risk in hypertensive population.
Methods:
A total of 1,380 participants (782 hypertensive patients and 598 normotensive controls) were enrolled. Demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, arterial stiffness, left ventricular structural and functional indices, and 10-year atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk calculated via the China Atherosclerotic CVD Risk Prediction model (China-PAR) were collected and analyzed. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent determinants of SEVR and factors linked to high ASCVD risk (>10%).
Results:
Mean SEVR was significantly lower in the hypertensive group than in the control group (130.75% vs. 136.38%, P<0.001). SEVR was negatively correlated with age, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), E/e' ratio, arterial velocity index, and arterial pressure-volume index (all P<0.001). Multivariable linear regression identified age (β=-0.106, P=0.001), HR (β=-0.618, P<0.001), SBP (β=0.024, P=0.023), arterial pressure volume index (API) (β=-0.338, P<0.001), and hemoglobin (β=0.219, P=0.001) as independent determinants of SEVR. Logistic regression (Model 2, adjusted for sex, smoking, SBP, and HR) showed that SEVR was independently associated with a 10-year ASCVD (10Y-ASCVD) risk >10% [odds ratio (OR) =0.953, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.940-0.965, P<0.001]. Male sex (OR =1.973, P=0.001), current smoking (OR =2.665, P=0.001), and SBP (OR =1.015, P=0.003) were significant risk factors, while HR was protective (OR =0.949, P<0.001). In risk stratification, the high-risk group (10Y-ASCVD risk >10%) had significantly lower SEVR than the low-risk group in both hypertensive (122.72% vs. 131.92%, P<0.05) and control subjects (123.91% vs. 137.67%, P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that SEVR identified high ASCVD risk with an area under the curve of 0.706 in controls and 0.630 in hypertensives.
Conclusions:
SEVR is inversely associated with 10Y-ASCVD risk in individuals with hypertension and remains an independent indicator after adjustment for conventional risk factors. As a noninvasive and cost-effective marker reflecting myocardial oxygen supply-demand balance, SEVR has the potential to add complementary value to current cardiovascular risk assessment models, thereby refining risk stratification in patients with hypertension.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...