Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

09:37
Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Activation Using Respiratory Motor Control Assessment (RMCA) in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: July 19, 2013
Understanding Adherence to Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Chronic Spinal Cord
Lenka Honzatkova1,2, Marnie Graco3,4, Jiri Kriz1,5
12nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
|August 12, 2026
Summary
Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) show high adherence for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. These devices are well-tolerated and improve OSA treatment outcomes in this population.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Pulmonology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard OSA treatment, but adherence is often poor in the SCI population.
- Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) present a promising alternative for OSA management in SCI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate adherence rates to MADs in individuals with SCI.
- To identify common side effects associated with MAD use.
- To explore patient-reported barriers and enablers for MAD usage in SCI.
Main Methods:
- Custom-made MADs were provided to individuals with chronic SCI and moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥15/hour).
- Participants attended follow-up appointments at 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment initiation.
- Adherence, side effects, and user experiences were assessed via questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
Main Results:
- Out of 40 participants, 35 completed the study. Adherence was 65% at 1 month and increased to 70% at 6 months.
- Adherent participants showed significantly greater improvements in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) compared to nonadherent individuals (P = .02).
- Key motivators included reduced fatigue and snoring; temporary side effects did not lead to discontinuation.
Conclusions:
- MADs are an acceptable and well-tolerated treatment for OSA in individuals with SCI.
- Adherence rates for MADs in this population are substantially higher (approximately 3x) than those reported for CPAP.
- Increased access to MADs could improve effective OSA treatment for a greater number of SCI patients.
