Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Assessment of the Metabolic Effects of Isocaloric 2:1 Intermittent Fasting in Mice
Published on: November 27, 2019
Comparative Policy Analysis of Healthcare Healthy Eating Policies in Canada
Laura J Kennedy1, Sara F L Kirk2, Alisson Dykeman3
1School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Background:
Healthy eating policies are of growing importance to the management of retail food environments in healthcare (e.g., hospital cafeterias). Several researchers have begun to analyse health promoting benchmarks within these policies. However, little is understood about the relationship between policy and continuous quality improvement (CQI) for health promotion in healthcare. Furthering our understanding of benchmarks within these policies could provide insight into how we can measure and create standards in health promotion. This policy analysis examined publicly accessible healthcare healthy eating policies in Canadian health authority jurisdictions, up until November 22, 2022.
Methods:
Data was extracted using a monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluating nutrition policies in publicly funded institutions, with adaptations based on organisational CQI concepts. Policy components analysed included: policy design, nutrient profiling systems, nutrition standards, evaluation, and monitoring. A second reviewer independently extracted data and peer debriefing was completed on the extractions.
Results:
This analysis identified five healthy eating policies meeting the inclusion criteria, from Alberta, British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and Winnipeg, Manitoba. Policies included nutrient profiling, including benchmarks for selling healthy, moderately healthy, and less healthy food and beverages. Other benchmarks were mentioned but contained fewer indicators (e.g., fundraising, catering, and advertising). Policies included benchmarks about product and placement (e.g., healthier items in visible places) but less about price. The included policies promoted collaboration amongst healthcare providers but lacked details about evaluation and monitoring.
Conclusion:
This policy analysis suggests that different healthcare settings may require different benchmarks, tailored to their contexts. Furthermore, standardisation may not be optimal if further experimentation is needed to identify benchmarks for health promotion practices, as is common in healthcare CQI. Policy implementation requires a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches, and collaboration with multiple partners may be necessary for success. Benchmarking processes are a potential strategy for understanding improvements to other aspects of the food environment beyond nutrient standards.
So What:
CQI and retail food environments each focus on customer satisfaction and costs, thus sharing alignments. CQI benchmarking processes are a potential strategy for understanding improvements to other aspects of the food environment beyond nutrient standards. Further exploration is needed to implement and monitor benchmarks over time.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Secondary Healthcare System
Health Literacy
