Adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis...

Randomized trials suggest that adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) may reduce recurrence in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), but potential sources of variability in treatment effects across studies remain poorly understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMAE and to explore potential study-level sources of between-study heterogeneity.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing MMAE plus surgery versus surgery alone, following PRISMA guidelines. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was prespecified to assess the robustness of pooled findings. Exploratory mixed-effects meta-regression was performed to examine whether aggregate study-level mean age and anticoagulation use were associated with variability in recurrence outcomes.

Eight trials including 1961 patients were analyzed. MMAE plus surgery was associated with a reduction in recurrence compared with surgery alone (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.85; I² = 0%), and TSA supported this finding. Although conventional meta-analysis suggested a reduction in reoperation, the TSA findings were more sensitive to analytical assumptions and less robust. Exploratory study-level meta-regression analyses suggested possible associations between recurrence outcomes and mean age or anticoagulation use, although these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating only. Safety outcomes were comparable between groups.

Adjunctive MMAE was associated with reduced recurrence in CSDH. Exploratory analyses evaluating aggregate study-level characteristics were limited by the small number of included trials and the use of aggregate-level data, and should be considered hypothesis-generating only. Further prospective studies are needed to better understand variability in treatment effects.