Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Sleeve Gastrectomy in Mice using Surgical Clips
Published on: November 14, 2020
Oral and gut microbiota features associated with weight-loss outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery: A pilot
Ahmed Alwali1, Louise B Thingholm2, Corinna Bang3
1Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Background:
Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective treatment for severe obesity, yet postoperative weight loss outcomes vary considerably between patients. With the relevance of the gut microbiome for obesity, it is of interest to understand the potential role of the oral and gut microbiota for the outcome of MBS. This pilot, hypothesis-generating study aimed to investigate associations between microbiota features and postoperative weight loss outcomes after MBS, assessed by percentage excess weight loss (EWL).
Methods:
In this pilot study, microbiota profiles from multiple body sites were analyzed in 33 patients undergoing MBS. Stool, oral swab, serum, and adipose tissue samples were collected at the time of surgery; stool and oral samples were collected again six months postoperatively. Microbiota diversity and composition were assessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and related to EWL and metabolic outcomes. Bacterial DNA in adipose tissue and serum was explored as an indirect marker of microbial translocation.
Results:
Higher diversity of the oral microbiota before surgery was associated with greater postoperative EWL. Stool microbiota diversity increased after surgery and was positively associated with EWL, suggesting postoperative recovery of the gut microbiota in patients with better weight loss outcomes. At the taxonomic level, higher postoperative abundance of Alistipes was observed in stool of patients achieving the greatest EWL, while for the oral cavity at time of operation, Veillonella, a bacteria considered largely beneficial in the oral cavity, was found to be positively associated with response. Community-level analyses of bacterial profiles in subcutaneous fat samples taken at time of MBS showed associations with both EWL (R2 = 0.097, p = 0.006) and BMI (R2 = 0.055, p = 0.017), whereas no associations were observed for visceral fat or serum. Findings related to individual bacterial taxa and extraintestinal compartments should be interpreted cautiously due to the exploratory nature of the analyses.
Conclusions:
This exploratory pilot study suggests that oral and gut microbiota features may be associated with weight loss outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery. Future studies are required for validation in larger, procedure-specific cohorts with adjustment for clinical confounders.
Related Concept Videos
The Oral Microbiota
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics
Dysbiosis of the Gut Microbiota
Development of Human Microbiota
Microbiota of the Stomach and Small Intestine
Functions of the Gut Microbiota
