Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Clinical Efficacy of an Innovative Multidimensional Traction Therapy in Moderate Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Published on: February 10, 2026
AI-driven Assessment of Vertebral Rotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Weight-bearing Cone-beam CT
Jianrong He1, Zejun Liang1, Fanzhuang Rong2
1Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China (J.H., Z.L., Y.Z., Y.Z., M.Z., Z.L., J.T.).
Abstract:
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for quantifying vertebral rotation angles on weight-bearing cone-beam CT images in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, and to investigate how well the 2D Nash & Moe grading system represents 3D vertebral rotation under weight-bearing conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 72 adolescents with AIS. Six predefined vertebrae per patient were manually measured by two radiologists, while all vertebrae were also processed using a U-Net-based algorithm to obtain automated rotation angles. Nash & Moe grades were assessed from standing radiographs. Agreement was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland-Altman analysis, and correlation tests. The explanatory power of Nash & Moe grades for 3D vertebral rotation was analyzed by linear regression. RESULTS: Automated vertebral rotation angles demonstrated good agreement and strong correlation with manual measurements (ICC = 0.881, 95% CI 0.852-0.905; Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.900, 95% CI 0.871-0.920). Linear regression showed strong relationships between automated and manual measurements for thoracic (R2 = 0.776) and lumbar vertebrae (R2 = 0.792). Nash & Moe grades exhibited moderate explanatory power for 3D rotation measured by the algorithm (R2 = 0.549 thoracic and R2 = 0.628 lumbar), with similar results for manual measurements (R2 = 0.532 thoracic; R2 = 0.621 lumbar). CONCLUSION: The AI-driven algorithm showed good agreement with manual measurements and enabled reliable automated quantification of vertebral rotation under weight-bearing conditions, whereas the 2D Nash & Moe method provides only approximate estimates and lacks precision for detailed assessment. This automated 3D approach may improve scoliosis evaluation and support more informed clinical decision-making in AIS management.
More Related Videos
07:01Clinical Efficacy of Ultrasound-Assisted Scoliosis-Specific Exercise in Mild-Grade Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Published on: December 2, 2025
08:08Cell-based Assay Protocol for the Prognostic Prediction of Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Cellular Dielectric Spectroscopy
Published on: October 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical bending,...