Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
Published on: November 11, 2022
Volatile Fingerprinting and Interpretable Machine Learning for Quality Differentiation of Astragali Radix from
Shulin Yu1, Ziyue Song1, Yunqi Sun1
1School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China.
Abstract:
Volatile fingerprints provide useful information for characterizing Astragali Radix (AR), a food-medicine homologous plant material, but differences among wild, wild-simulated, and cultivated samples remain unclear. In this study, headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) and headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) were integrated with multivariate analysis and interpretable machine learning to characterize volatile profiles and identify candidate discriminatory compounds in 117 AR samples from different cultivation patterns. HS-SPME-GC-MS tentatively identified 29, 34, and 45 volatile compounds in wild, wild-simulated, and cultivated samples, respectively. Esters were the predominant class in all groups, although the relative abundance of esters and the overall chemical-class composition varied among cultivation patterns. HS-GC-IMS tentatively identified 57, 50, and 55 compounds, respectively, comprising mainly low-molecular-weight aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones and thereby providing complementary volatile fingerprint information. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) showed that the volatile fingerprints captured cultivation-pattern-associated differences, with the HS-GC-IMS model showing clearer group separation. Random forest, support vector machine, and CatBoost models were further constructed using the HS-SPME-GC-MS profiling results. By integrating variable importance in projection (VIP) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values, γ-hexalactone, methyl eugenol, methyl (9Z,11E)-octadeca-9,11-dienoate, eugenol, and ethyl linoleate were selected as candidate discriminatory compounds. Based on the HS-GC-IMS results, 1-octen-3-one, pentyl acetate, (Z)-2-penten-1-ol, 2-heptanone, and the monomeric signal of 2-ethyl-6-methylpyrazine were also identified as candidate discriminatory compounds. These compounds may be related to fatty acid-derived metabolism, aromatic secondary metabolism, and terpenoid-related processes. The integration of two complementary volatile-analysis platforms with VIP- and SHAP-based interpretation provided broader coverage of volatile features and improved the interpretability of candidate-compound screening. These findings provide an interpretable analytical workflow and candidate discriminatory compounds that may support future rapid screening, cultivation-pattern authentication, and volatile-profile-based differentiation of AR, pending independent external validation.

