Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

07:33
Nanopore DNA Sequencing for Metagenomic Soil Analysis
Published on: December 14, 2017
Detecting Plant-Based Food Fraud Using Nanopore Metabarcoding: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Lucas Marmin1, Fanny Ruby1, Patrick Philipp1
1Laboratoire SCL de Strasbourg, Chemin du Routoir, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France.
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 13, 2026
Summary
DNA metabarcoding using nanopore sequencing offers a sensitive, cost-effective method for detecting economically motivated adulteration (EMA) in plant-based foods like spices and teas. This approach enhances food authenticity testing and consumer trust.
Area of Science:
- Food Science
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) is a significant threat to food safety, consumer trust, and regulatory compliance, particularly in plant-based food products.
- Traditional detection methods often fail with processed foods and complex mixtures, necessitating advanced analytical techniques.
- DNA metabarcoding presents a powerful, non-targeted, high-throughput alternative for identifying adulterants in food matrices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a cost-effective, user-friendly nanopore sequencing-based DNA metabarcoding workflow for detecting economically motivated adulteration (EMA) in food products.
- To assess the sensitivity and reliability of the proposed method using spices and herbal teas as model systems.
- To compare the efficacy of multi-marker (ITS2 + matK + trnH-psbA) versus single-marker approaches for improved detection.
Main Methods:
- Development of a nanopore sequencing workflow for DNA extraction and metabarcoding analysis.
- Utilized a combination of three DNA markers (ITS2, matK, trnH-psbA) for enhanced species identification.
- Validated the method using eight single-species reference samples and five commercial multi-ingredient food products.
Main Results:
- The nanopore sequencing method successfully detected undeclared plant ingredients and species substitutions in commercial food samples, such as mint in oregano.
- The combined ITS2 + matK + trnH-psbA marker set demonstrated higher sensitivity compared to single-barcode methods.
- The workflow achieved a 2-4 day turnaround time with minimal infrastructure requirements.
Conclusions:
- The developed DNA metabarcoding workflow is a sensitive, cost-effective, and rapid screening tool for assessing food authenticity and detecting economically motivated adulteration (EMA).
- The method shows potential for compliance with food labelling regulations (e.g., EU 1169/2011) and food safety programs (e.g., FDA EMA).
- Further research is needed to validate against regulatory limits and expand application to diverse species and processed food matrices, addressing DNA degradation and database limitations.

