Related Experiment Videos
Perforated Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Surgical Management Strategies
Sang-Ho Jeong1, Sung Jin Oh2, Kyung Won Seo3
1Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon 51472, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Gastric cancer complicated by free perforation is a rare but life-threatening oncological emergency, accounting for 0.3% ~ 3.9% of all gastric cancer cases. This review summarizes current evidence on the epidemiology, diagnosis, surgical management, and prognostic determinants of perforated gastric cancer, with emphasis on stage-adapted treatment strategies. It should be noted, however, that the available evidence is derived exclusively from retrospective studies, and all recommendations should be interpreted in the context of this inherent limitation. Relevant studies addressing perforation patterns, perioperative outcomes, one-stage versus two-stage gastrectomy, repair-only approaches, and management of metastatic disease were reviewed. Perforation typically arises from tumors located on the anterior wall or greater curvature, where transmural invasion creates direct communication with the peritoneal cavity, resulting in diffuse peritonitis and substantial postoperative mortality. Available pooled evidence suggests that radical resection, when oncologically and physiologically feasible, is associated with better survival than repair-only strategies. Comparative retrospective data suggest that two-stage gastrectomy may be associated with higher R0 resection rates and lower in-hospital mortality compared with emergency one-stage resection, without compromising long-term survival when curative resection is ultimately achieved; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the exclusively retrospective evidence base and the inherent patient selection bias in all published comparisons. In patients with stage IV disease or confirmed distant metastases, stomach-preserving source control followed by systemic chemotherapy may be a rational alternative. Prognosis is primarily determined by TNM stage and R0 resection status, similar to non-perforated gastric cancer. Individualized treatment based on tumor stage, resectability, peritoneal contamination, and physiological reserve is essential.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current medication...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: