Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Aspirin in Primary Prevention of CVD: A Pragmatic Outline and Advice for Treatment Personalization
Francesca Santilli1, Dirk Sibbing2,3,4, Augusto Maria Lavalle Cobo5
1Department of Medicine and Aging and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Luigi Polacchi 11, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Insights
Low-dose aspirin may benefit selected individuals for primary cardiovascular disease prevention. A new framework uses clinical, imaging, and biomarker markers to guide personalized risk-benefit discussions, balancing cardiovascular benefits against bleeding risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global cause of death.
- Low-dose aspirin is recommended for secondary CVD prevention but its primary prevention role is debated due to bleeding risks.
- Current guidelines for primary prevention are heterogeneous in risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence on aspirin for primary CVD prevention.
- To present a tiered framework for individualized risk-benefit assessment of aspirin therapy.
- To guide clinical discussions on preventive aspirin use.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of randomized trials, guidelines, and observational studies.
- Development of a tiered framework using clinical, imaging (coronary artery calcium, carotid plaque), and biomarker (lipoprotein(a)) markers.
- Analysis of risk-benefit profiles in different patient subgroups.
Main Results:
- Selected patients with subclinical atherosclerosis or high-risk markers may benefit from aspirin.
- Evidence certainty varies across subgroups.
- A tiered framework aids in discussing aspirin's risks and benefits.
Conclusions:
- Individualized assessment is crucial for primary prevention aspirin therapy.
- A pragmatic framework can support clinical decision-making.
- Balancing absolute cardiovascular risk, bleeding risk, evidence certainty, and patient preferences is essential.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. While low-dose aspirin is well established for secondary prevention, its role in primary prevention is controversial because modest benefits in cardiovascular benefits must be balanced against increased bleeding risk, as highlighted by recent large trials. Current guidelines recommend restricting aspirin use to individuals at higher cardiovascular risk without elevated bleeding risk, yet significant heterogeneity persists in defining these thresholds. Evidence from randomized trials, guidelines, cohort and modeling analyses, and post hoc or observational subgroup studies suggests that selected patients with advanced subclinical atherosclerosis or specific high-risk markers may have a more favorable risk-benefit profile, although the certainty and directness of evidence vary across subgroups. This narrative review and pragmatic clinical guide presents an illustrative tiered framework based on clinical, imaging, and biomarker markers-such as coronary artery calcium score, carotid plaque score, and lipoprotein(a)-to support individualized discussion of preventive aspirin therapy. The framework is not a validated risk calculator or standalone treatment algorithm, and decisions should balance absolute cardiovascular risk, major bleeding risk, evidence certainty, and patient preferences.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures