Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Automated Deployment of an Internet Protocol Telephony Service on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Network Functions Virtualization
Published on: November 26, 2019
Assessing the Effectiveness of Frequency Manoeuvring in UAV Networks Under Jamming and Interference
Piotr Targowski1, Sebastian Łeska1, Jakub Walczak1
1Faculty of Cybernetics, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.
None:
This paper investigates frequency manoeuvring as a method to improve the resilience of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) networks operating in contested electromagnetic environments. The study considers scenarios in which the network initially operates on a single channel and is then exposed to intentional jamming or unintentional interference affecting the primary channel, adjacent channels or a wider frequency range. Several response policies are compared, including no channel change, immediate switching after quality degradation is detected, delayed switching after a defined loss-of-connectivity interval, and periodic frequency hopping. In addition to channel switching, the analysis also considers changes in channel bandwidth, comparing narrower channels with lower throughput but potentially higher resistance to interference against wider channels with greater capacity but increased susceptibility to disruption. The evaluation includes the switching cost, which is modelled as temporary packet loss, additional delay and jitter during reconfiguration. Performance is assessed using the packet delivery ratio, latency, jitter, packet loss and communication continuity. The main objective is to identify the interference conditions under which frequency manoeuvring becomes operationally beneficial and to determine which policy offers the best trade-off between resilience and communication performance. In quantitative terms, immediate switching under environmental interference achieved a PDR of 0.961 and a mean latency of 123.6 ms compared with a PDR of 0.946 and a mean latency of 138.7 ms for fixed-channel operation. Manoeuvring gave a substantial 12.2-percentage-point PDR gain under jamming (periodic hopping: 0.780 vs. 0.658) and a 6.7-percentage-point gain under combined interference (0.674 vs. 0.607). These results indicate that manoeuvring is most worthwhile once interference is persistent and channel-focused rather than purely environmental.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Expected Frequency
Interference and Diffraction
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any finite,...
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the system's...
Propagation Speed of Electromagnetic Waves
Intensity Of Electromagnetic Waves

