Related Experiment Videos
Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks for Uncertainty-Aware Classification of Infrasound Events
1Key Laboratory of Chemistry for NBC Hazards Protection, Beijing 102205, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 13, 2026
Summary
This study introduces a Bayesian convolutional neural network (CNN) for infrasound signal classification, improving accuracy and quantifying uncertainty for applications like nuclear-test verification and natural-hazard warning.
Area of Science:
- Geophysics
- Signal Processing
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Accurate infrasound signal classification is crucial for nuclear-test verification, natural-hazard warning, and geophysical monitoring.
- Conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) struggle with small, imbalanced datasets and quantifying predictive uncertainty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a Bayesian CNN framework to address limitations of conventional CNNs in infrasound signal classification.
- To quantify epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty in infrasound signal classification models.
Main Methods:
- Implemented a Bayesian CNN framework using variational approximation, converting standard networks (LeNet-5, AlexNet, 4Conv3Fc) into Bayesian counterparts.
- Utilized short-time Fourier transform (STFT) to generate time-frequency spectrograms as input for the models.
- Evaluated models on a highly imbalanced dataset including nuclear tests, explosions, volcanic eruptions, rocket launches, earthquakes, and lightning.
Main Results:
- Bayes 4Conv3Fc achieved 99.14% accuracy on an imbalanced dataset without data augmentation.
- Demonstrated significant improvements in precision (up to 6.91%), recall (up to 7.12%), F1-score (up to 7.20%), and Cohen's Kappa (up to 8.86%) compared to deterministic baselines.
- Bayesian models showed lower Brier scores than class-weighted cross-entropy, indicating benefits from uncertainty modeling.
Conclusions:
- The Bayesian CNN framework effectively classifies infrasound signals, outperforming conventional methods on imbalanced datasets.
- Quantified and validated reliable epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty estimates, enhancing model interpretability and reliability.
- The approach offers a promising direction for uncertainty-aware infrasound monitoring and event detection.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Signals
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...