Predicting Subjective Usability from Kinematic Data in IMU-Based Robotic Teleoperation

Robotic teleoperation is a core enabling technology spanning remote surgery, industrial inspection, and virtual-reality applications. Despite growing deployment, operator experience assessment still relies almost exclusively on post hoc subjective questionnaires, which preclude real-time monitoring and adaptive intervention. Here, the wearable IMU chain is considered not only as a command interface but also as an implicit sensing channel for operator state. We test whether end-effector kinematics generated by the IMU-to-robot mapping contain information about ten post-task workload and user-experience dimensions, comprising NASA-TLX-inspired workload scales together with usability, responsiveness, realism, intuitiveness, and perceived performance. A secondary analysis of a publicly available dataset (16 participants, 144 motion recordings, simulated UR10e arm) is conducted through a three-stage pipeline: bivariate correlation analysis (Pearson and Spearman), multivariate regression (10 model families, 16 feature-set combinations, Leave-One-Subject-Out validation), and binary classification (median-split). Statistical validity is assessed via 1000-permutation nested testing. Target-specific regression models reach R2≥0.50 on seven out of 10 subjective dimensions, with a peak of R2=0.787 for usability; permutation testing confirms significance for eight out of 10 targets. Binary classification achieves AUC ≥0.75 on nine out of 10 targets, with three dimensions reaching perfect AUC. SHAP analysis identifies temporal irregularity and distributional shape descriptors as the dominant kinematic explanatory families. These results support the feasibility of kinematics-based inference of operator experience and provide an offline proof of concept toward future real-time adaptive teleoperation systems.