Interventional Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients Above 85 Years of Age
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Florian Jürgens1, Florian Schindhelm1, Mohammed Abusharekh1
1Clinic of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Background:
Mitral valve transcatheter-edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is routinely performed in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high operative risk, frequently including elderly patients. Patients ≥ 85 years, however, are frequently excluded in clinical studies.
Objectives:
We evaluated differences of procedural characteristics and outcomes following M-TEER in patients < versus ≥ 85 years.
Methods:
We retrospectively included consecutive patients with severe MR who underwent M-TEER with the PASCAL device between 2019 and 2024 at our center. Baseline and procedural characteristics, short- and mid-term outcomes were compared, stratifying the cohort into patients < versus ≥ 85 years.
Results:
Three hundred seventy-five patients with moderate to severe or severe MR were eligible; 71 aged ≥ 85 (87.0 ± 1.7 years, 57.7% male) and 304 aged < 85 (75.5 ± 10.0 years, 58.6% male) years. Patients aged ≥ 85 years more frequently had severe MR (90.1% vs. 73.8%, p = 0.005) and higher STS-Score (6.4 [3.8; 9.1] vs. 3.5 [2.2; 6.5], p < 0.0001) at baseline. No leaflet injury, single leaflet detachment or any other device-related complication was observed, irrespective of age. Residual MR at 90 days was comparable among age groups (Trace: 34.8% vs. 23.8%; mild: 41.3% vs. 57.3%; moderate: 23.9% vs. 18.5%; moderate-severe: 0% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.56). Within 30 days, no death occurred in patients aged ≥ 85 years (one death in the < 85 years group). Median mid-term follow-up was 430 [164; 692] days. Overall mortality was not different for patients ≥ versus < 85 years (5.6% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.76).
Conclusion:
M-TEER is safe in patients ≥ 85 years, with procedural outcomes and mid-term prognosis similar to younger cohorts.
Insights
Mitral valve transcatheter-edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is safe and effective for patients aged 85 and older with severe mitral regurgitation. Outcomes and mid-term prognosis were similar to younger patients, demonstrating M-TEER
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Mitral valve transcatheter-edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a standard treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in high-risk patients.
- Elderly patients, particularly those aged 85 years and older, are often excluded from clinical studies despite being a common demographic for M-TEER.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare procedural characteristics and outcomes of M-TEER in patients aged 85 years and older versus those younger than 85.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the PASCAL device in elderly patients undergoing M-TEER.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe MR who underwent M-TEER using the PASCAL device (2019-2024).
- Patients were stratified into two groups: < 85 years and ≥ 85 years.
- Comparison of baseline characteristics, procedural data, and short- to mid-term outcomes.
Main Results:
- 71 patients aged ≥ 85 years (mean age 87.0 years) and 304 patients aged < 85 years (mean age 75.5 years) were included.
- Patients ≥ 85 years had more severe MR and higher STS scores at baseline.
- No device-related complications were observed in either group. Residual MR at 90 days and overall mortality were comparable between the age groups.
- No deaths occurred within 30 days in the ≥ 85 years group.
Conclusions:
- M-TEER with the PASCAL device is safe and effective in patients aged 85 years and older with severe MR.
- Procedural outcomes and mid-term prognosis for M-TEER in octogenarians are similar to those in younger patient cohorts.
- This study supports the use of M-TEER in very elderly patients who are often excluded from clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
