Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Flexible Connectors for Use in Insulated Concrete Wall Panels
Published on: October 19, 2022
Collapse Prevention Seismic Performance Assessment of New Special Concentrically Braced Frames using ASCE 41
Matthew S Speicher1, John L Harris1
1National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
This study assessed seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs) using ASCE 41-06. Nonlinear analysis revealed braces failed to meet criteria, necessitating model and criteria adjustments for improved seismic resilience.
Area of Science:
- Structural Engineering
- Earthquake Engineering
- Seismic Performance Assessment
Background:
- Special Concentrically Braced Frames (SCBFs) are critical seismic force-resisting systems.
- Building codes like the International Building Code (IBC) and standards such as ASCE 7 and ASCE 41 guide seismic design and assessment.
- Understanding the correlation between design (ASCE 7-10) and assessment (ASCE 41-06) standards is crucial for accurate seismic performance evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the seismic performance of SCBFs designed per the 2012 IBC using ASCE 41-06.
- To investigate the correlation between seismic performance predicted by ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 41-06.
- To identify factors contributing to performance discrepancies and recommend improvements.
Main Methods:
- Designed three archetype buildings (4-, 8-, 16-story) with SCBFs.
- Utilized Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) and Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) procedures for seismic design.
- Conducted linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analyses for performance assessment per ASCE 41-06.
Main Results:
- Linear analyses showed minor column issues and no brace issues.
- Nonlinear analyses indicated consistent failure of SCBF braces to meet ASCE 41-06 assessment criteria.
- Discrepancies were observed between performance anticipated by ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 41-06.
Conclusions:
- Nonlinear analysis is essential for identifying critical brace performance issues in SCBFs.
- Current ASCE 41-06 criteria may not fully capture the seismic demands on SCBF braces.
- Recommendations include using advanced ground motion selection, higher fidelity brace models, and ductility/energy-based acceptance criteria for improved seismic assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Design of Prismatic Beams for Bending
Frames
Frames are versatile and widely used in various applications such as structural supports for beams and columns, automobile chassis construction, and in the construction...
Design of Columns under an Eccentric Load
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Eccentric Loading
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
