Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Pre-clinical Model of Cardiac Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 2, 2019
Deactivation of Cardiac Devices at the End of Life: Clinical and Ethical Challenges
Marie-Gabrielle Courtès1,2, Fiona Ecarnot3,4, Mathilde Giffard5,6
1Sion Hospital, Avenue du Grand Champsec 80, 1951, Sion, Switzerland. courtes.marie@gmail.com.
Insights
Deactivating life-sustaining devices like implantable cardioverter-defibrillators is ethically permissible for heart failure patients. Early discussions and palliative care are crucial for patient-centered decisions regarding device deactivation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Ethics
- Palliative Care
Background:
- The use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in heart failure patients is increasing.
- Device deactivation presents complex clinical and ethical challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence and consensus on device deactivation in heart failure.
- To emphasize the importance of early communication and patient preferences.
Main Methods:
- Synthesis of the latest evidence and professional society guidelines.
- Review of ethical and legal permissibility of device deactivation.
- Analysis of clinical practice gaps in advance care planning.
Main Results:
- Guidelines permit device deactivation (ICDs, pacemakers, MCS) upon patient/surrogate request.
- Discussions on device deactivation are recommended during pre-implantation consent but remain infrequent.
- Deactivating CIEDs can prevent end-of-life shocks, improving quality of life.
Conclusions:
- Multidisciplinary involvement, including palliative care, is essential for informed decision-making.
- Early and ongoing communication about device deactivation is vital.
- Individualized care integrating patient preferences throughout the disease trajectory is necessary.
Purpose Of Review:
Device deactivation in patients with heart failure is an increasingly relevant clinical and ethical challenge as the use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices expands.
Recent Findings:
Current guidelines affirm the ethical and legal permissibility of deactivating life-sustaining devices, including implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, pacemakers, and mechanical circulatory support systems, when requested by patients or surrogates with decision-making capacity. Importantly, guidelines from professional societies recommend that discussions about device deactivation be included in the pre-implantation consent process. However, clinical practice reveals persistent gaps in advance care planning, with device deactivation discussions remaining infrequent. Deactivating implantable cardioverter defibrillators can prevent painful and unnecessary shocks at the end of life, which may otherwise prolong dying without improving quality of life. Multidisciplinary involvement, including palliative care consultation, is essential to support patient-centered decision-making and symptom management. This review synthesizes the latest evidence and consensus on device deactivation in heart failure, emphasizing the need for communication, initiated early in the disease course, as well as individualized care, and integration of patient preferences throughout the disease trajectory.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Ethical Dilemmas II
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
